<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obfuscated javascript challenge</title>
	<link>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/</link>
	<description>The building blocks of a solid frontend.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Aaka Fosfor</title>
		<link>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-2050</link>
		<author>Aaka Fosfor</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-2050</guid>
		<description>really good stuff;)

imho for 1st challenge can't be found universal "reverse" function. it can be only some form of brutal-force, although optimalized for nearly linear complexity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really good stuff;)</p>
<p>imho for 1st challenge can&#8217;t be found universal &#8220;reverse&#8221; function. it can be only some form of brutal-force, although optimalized for nearly linear complexity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathias Kutzner</title>
		<link>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-2026</link>
		<author>Mathias Kutzner</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 18:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-2026</guid>
		<description>solved the first one with a "reverse" function. At least I think it could be called a reverse function because it uses the digest and calculates a password (most likely not THE password) from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>solved the first one with a &#8220;reverse&#8221; function. At least I think it could be called a reverse function because it uses the digest and calculates a password (most likely not THE password) from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arrix</title>
		<link>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1301</link>
		<author>Arrix</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1301</guid>
		<description>Not sure whether it's "plain" brute force. However, I didn't find a reverse function.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure whether it&#8217;s &#8220;plain&#8221; brute force. However, I didn&#8217;t find a reverse function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gevorg Sargsyan</title>
		<link>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1291</link>
		<author>Gevorg Sargsyan</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>Actually the way I did it can be called "bruteforcing" - yes. 

- Gevorg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the way I did it can be called &#8220;bruteforcing&#8221; - yes. </p>
<p>- Gevorg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White</title>
		<link>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1286</link>
		<author>White</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1286</guid>
		<description>Arrix and Gevorg, did you just plain bruteforce the first one or did you actually try to reverse engeneer it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arrix and Gevorg, did you just plain bruteforce the first one or did you actually try to reverse engeneer it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Benjaminsen</title>
		<link>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1269</link>
		<author>Chris Benjaminsen</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1269</guid>
		<description>Gevorg, drop me the password on messenger and I shall upgrade you hall of fame status.

Arrix, Indeed they are. I had a quick look at your homepage, my guess is that you have some great ideas for challenges yourself. If so please drop me an email at the address written above.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gevorg, drop me the password on messenger and I shall upgrade you hall of fame status.</p>
<p>Arrix, Indeed they are. I had a quick look at your homepage, my guess is that you have some great ideas for challenges yourself. If so please drop me an email at the address written above.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arrix</title>
		<link>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1265</link>
		<author>Arrix</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 17:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1265</guid>
		<description>The strange stuff is strange indeed, especially the class one. But it's a bit misleading as are the challenges. Very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The strange stuff is strange indeed, especially the class one. But it&#8217;s a bit misleading as are the challenges. Very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gevorg Sargsyan</title>
		<link>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1261</link>
		<author>Gevorg Sargsyan</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 13:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>Okies, Gevorg Sargsyan solved also 2nd one, and that was uncomparable easier then 1st one. 

Will be interesting to see if any one solves 1st.

Regards
Gevorg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okies, Gevorg Sargsyan solved also 2nd one, and that was uncomparable easier then 1st one. </p>
<p>Will be interesting to see if any one solves 1st.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Gevorg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Benjaminsen</title>
		<link>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1247</link>
		<author>Chris Benjaminsen</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 19:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>Guess I was to fast there, fixed. And thanks for pointing it out. I would never have seen it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess I was to fast there, fixed. And thanks for pointing it out. I would never have seen it :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1246</link>
		<author>Steve</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 19:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://parentnode.org/javascript/obfuscated-javascript-challenge/#comment-1246</guid>
		<description>No time to solve 1 or 2, but the spelling of "Stange" is well, "Strange".

Cheers,
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No time to solve 1 or 2, but the spelling of &#8220;Stange&#8221; is well, &#8220;Strange&#8221;.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
